IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
Shriram General Insurance Company Limited - Appellant
Versus
Sharbani Ghosh W/o Late Sati Nath Ghosh - Respondent
M.A. No. 196 of 2024
Decided On : 05-02-2025
(A) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 168 - Appeal against the judgment/award dated 31.01.2024 in Motor Accident Claim Case No.65 of 2019 - Delay of 11 days in filing appeal condoned - The deceased, a bank manager, died in an accident involving a truck driven rashly - The learned Tribunal assessed the deceased’s income based on authentic documents including Form-16 - The insurance company contested the case on the grounds of the driver’s license validity but failed to prove that it was fake - The court upheld the Tribunal's finding regarding the deceased's income as there was no illegality in the assessment. (Paras 9, 13, 15)
(B) The court discussed the legal principles regarding the assessment of income for compensation and the use of Form-16 as a valid document for determining income. (Paras 14, 15)
Facts of the case:
The deceased was traveling with family and friends when their vehicle collided with a truck, resulting in his death. The deceased was a Chief Manager earning Rs.74,807.52 per month.
Findings of Court:
The court found no illegality in the Tribunal's award, dismissing the appeal.
Issues: The main issues were the assessment of the deceased's income and the validity of the driver's license.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the assessment of income based on authentic documents was correct and that the insurance company failed to establish the invalidity of the driver's license.
Result: Appeal dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, J.
1. I.A. No.6731 of 2024 has been filed for condoning the delay of 11 days in filing of the appeal
2. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that in preparation of presenting the appeal, such delay has occurred and in view of that the delay may kindly be condoned.
3. Mr. S.K. Laik, learned counsel has appeared on behalf of opposite party Nos.1 to 3 on caveat.
4. The Court finds that sufficient ground is made out for condoning the delay of 11 days, as such the delay of 11 days is hereby condoned.
5. I.A. allowed and disposed of.
6. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned counsel appearing for the opposite party Nos.1 to 3, who are the claimants.
7. This appeal is preferred against the judgment/award dated 31.01.2024 passed in Motor Accident Claim Case No.65 of 2019 by learned Principal District Judge-cum-P.O., Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhanbad.
8. Mr. Amaresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that on the ground of wrong assessment of the income, the present appeal has been filed.
9. It transpires from the judgment of the learned Tribunal that the claimants filed the claim case stating that on 23.09.2018 at about 7:00 PM the deceased Sati Nath Ghosh, his wife Sharbani Ghosh, his friend Praveer Majumdar and wife were travelling in a Hyundai I-10 Car No. JH-10AH-8338 and heading towards Dhanbad from Kolkata. At about 7:00 PM when they reached Junglepur More, G.T. Road, P.S. Govindpur, a truck No. HR-37B-4731 being driven rashly and negligently by its driver, suddenly applied brake due to which Hyundai I-10 Car dashed against the truck resultantly his friend died on the spot and deceased, who was driver-cum-owner of the car and others occupants sustained severe injuries. They were rushed to PMCH, Dhanbad but after first aid they were referred to Mission Hospital, Durgapur but on the way to hospital the deceased succumbed to his injuries. It is stated that the deceased was a Chief Manager with UCO Bank, Hirapur Branch, Dhanbad and getting Rs.74,807.52/- per month as salary. The Truck bearing No.HR-37B-4731 was insured with the O.P. No.2 vide Insurance Policy No.10003/31/18/331076 from 24.09.2018 to 23.09.2019.
10. The insurance company contested the said case and common ground is taken that the offending vehicle was not holding valid and effective driving license apart from that no other grounds have been taken.
11. With regard to the license, the issue No.5 was framed by the learned Tribunal and while deciding the issue No.5 the learned Tribunal has considered the license of the driver which was marked as Mark-X/5 and found that license was issued on 19.04.1992 and valid till 13.07.2022 and the accident took place on 23.09.2018 on which date the driver of the offending vehicle was possessing a valid and effective license and authorized to drive transport vehicle and only objection was made of validity of the said license but no effort was taken to prove that the license was fake.
12. So far the permit is concerned that has been considered by the learned Tribunal in paragraph No.16 and the learned Tribunal has found that the permit was not there in view of that the recovery has been allowed by the insurance company after satisfying the same from the owner.
13. So far income of the deceased is concerned, the learned Tribunal has relied on the authentic documents like pay slip of of the deceased which was marked as Exhibit-X/15 to X/17. The claimants have also filed Form-16 (Mark-X/18) for the assessment year 2016-17 and for the purpose of assessing his monthly income, he has also looked into the Form-16 which was marked as Exhibit-X/18 and wherefrom he has found that the deceased’s income was Rs.9,10,455/- and the income tax was deducted to the tune of Rs.79,434/- and out of deducting the said he has come to the conclusion that his gross salary was Rs.8,31,021/-. On the valid document the said finding is there.
14. Form-16 was considered by Hon’ble
The court upheld the Tribunal's assessment of income based on valid documents, emphasizing the importance of authentic evidence in determining compensation for motor accident claims.
The court upheld the Tribunal's findings on income calculation and deduction percentage, emphasizing the necessity of justifying delays in appeals.
The court emphasized that mere procedural inefficiencies do not justify the condonation of significant delays in filing appeals.
The court may adopt a liberal approach in condoning the delay in filing an appeal, especially when seeking enhancement of compensation for a motor vehicle accident.
The assessment of income in fatal accident claims should rely on prevailing minimum wage in the absence of conclusive evidence of actual earnings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.