Ashok Kumar Swarnkar vs State of Jharkhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Jhk) 137

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Anil Kumar Choudhary
Ashok Kumar Swarnkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Jitendra Tripathi, Advocate, Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P.
For the Informant :Mr. Raunak Sahay, Advocate

Table of Content
1. petitioners' apprehension of arrest. (Para 2)
2. petitioners' arguments for bail. (Para 3)
3. state's opposition to bail. (Para 4)
4. court grants anticipatory bail. (Para 5)

ORDER :

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.

1.Heard the parties.

2. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Sadar (M) P.S. Case No.455 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 406 , 419, 420, 467, 468 and 120B of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in criminal conspiracy with the co-accused persons have pledged gold plated jwellery as pure gold jwelleries and has taken loan from the informant bank. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is submitted that admittedly, the two of the valuers of the bank, for the gold jwellery, after verification have done the valuation and they are not the petitioners in this anticipatory bail application; nor they have even been made accused in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioners are innocent, the informa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document