Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J., M.S. Ramachandra Rao, CJ.
M/s Indus Tower Limited, A Company – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Represented Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1) Heard both sides.
2) In this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed order of adjudication in FORM GST DRC-07 dt. 30.08.2024 issued by the 5th respondent under section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Jharkhand GST Act, 2017 for financial year 2019-2020.
3) Sri V. Laxmikumaran, learned senior counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, contends that in the impugned order passed by the 5th respondent, he had denied benefit of input tax credit, contrary to the decision of Supreme Court in M/s. Bharti Airtel Ltd. vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise , Pune [Civil Appeal Nos. 10409-10410 of 2014 dt. 20.11.2024] reported in 2024 INSC 880 and further explained and applied in the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Indus Towers Limited vs. Union of India & Ors. [W.P.(C) No. 14710/2024 dt. 12.12.2024]. He contends that the Supreme Court and the Delhi High Court in both the aforesaid judgments have held that mobile towers are not “immovable properties”, that they can be treated as “goods” and also as “inputs” used for providing output service of telecommunication, that they do not fall within the ambit of section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act, and input tax credit cannot be den
Input tax credit cannot be denied for mobile towers as they are classified as goods and not immovable property, per established legal precedents.
Telecommunication towers are considered movable property and qualify for input tax credit, as they do not meet the criteria for immovable property under Section 17(5) of the CGST Act.
Towers and shelters used in telecommunication qualify as 'inputs' under CENVAT Rules, allowing for credit claims despite being classified as immovable property.
Mobile towers and prefabricated buildings qualify as capital goods and inputs under CENVAT Rules, allowing mobile service providers to claim CENVAT credit on excise duties paid.
Maintenance of township is not integrally tied to business activities, thus ITC claims related to township electricity supply are invalid.
Dealers claiming input tax credit must establish genuine transactions and physical movement of goods with adequate proof; failure to do so may result in disallowance and recovery proceedings under th....
A taxpayer is entitled to input tax credit as determined by overriding previous judgments on similar matters.
Clauses (c) and (d) of Section 17(5) of the CGST Act are constitutional, allowing for reasonable classification regarding input tax credit for construction of immovable property.
Tax authorities must provide substantial evidence of fraud or suppression of facts before imposing penalties under Sections 74 and 50, especially when input tax credit has already been reversed volun....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
