JUDGMENT :

SANJAY PRASAD, J.

I.A. No. 6254 of 2024

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

2. Mr. Aditya Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 prays for time by submitting that Mrs. Shruti Shrestha, learned counsel has to argue this case on behalf of the opposite party no. 2.

3. However, this Court is not inclined to grant time on the aforesaid ground.

4. The present Criminal Revision No. 280 of 2024 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner challenging the judgment dated 30.09.2023 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 70 of 2023 by the Sri Vishwa Nath Shukla, learned Sessions Judge, Chaibasa whereby learned Sessions Judge, Chaibasa has dismissed the Criminal Appeal No. 70 of 2023 and affirmed the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.06.2023 passed by Sri Tausif Meraj, learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar West Singhbhum in connection with Complaint Case No. 41 of 2016 corresponding to T. R. No. 44 of 2023 by which the petitioner has been convicted for the offence under Section 4 98 (A) of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and has be