Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ARUN KUMAR RAI
Kali Krishna Patro, Son of Sr M Patro – Appellant
Versus
State Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ARUN KUMAR RAI, J.
Heard Ms. Ashwini Priya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Praful Jojo, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The instant Criminal Revision is against the judgment dated 19.06.2015 passed by Sri Sandeep Sharma learned Additional Sessions Judge Court IV at Jameshdpur in Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 2011 whereby the Criminal Appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order and judgment dated 13.01.2011 passed by Sri Anil Kumar Pandey, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Jamshedpur in Bistupur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2006 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 721 of 2006 by which the petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for two months and fine of Rs. 500/- for committing an offence under Section 279 , 337, of I.P.C. was affirmed and appeal preferred by the petitioner has been dismissed
3. In nutshell, the case of prosecution is based upon the fardbeyan of the informant which has been recorded on 21.03.2006 wherein, informant has allegedly stated that at about 7.30 A.M., the informant was returning home after morning walk from Jubli Park and when he reached near get No. 2 of children park, the driver of Hero Honda
Sole witness identification can support a conviction under IPC sections if credible, despite time lapse; prior sentence mitigated considering duration of trial and defendant's age.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's interpretation and application of the provisions related to rash and negligent driving under Sections 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal C....
The main legal point established is the application of the principles of rash and negligent driving under the Indian Penal Code, supported by consistent evidence and interpretation of relevant legal ....
Motor Accident - Rash and Negligence driving - Death - Conviction affirmed - Petitioner witnesses are independent eye witnesses to occurrence who are having their shops near place of occurrence and t....
The judgment establishes the importance of eyewitness testimony, medical evidence, and considerations of age and time spent in custody in determining the conviction and sentencing in cases involving ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that eyewitness accounts can be sufficient to establish the death of a victim in cases of rash and negligent driving, and there may not be a need f....
A conviction under criminal law requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt, which was lacking in this case, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt; conviction upheld despite some witnesses not being examined due to sufficient existing evidence.
A conviction cannot stand without credible evidence linking the accused to the commission of the crime.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
