Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Anita Devi, D/o of Sunil Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing of prior orders regarding prima facie case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defense of good faith under section 499 ipc. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. allegations of harm and necessity of proving good faith. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. no interference with the learned sessions judge’s order. (Para 9) |
| 5. dismissal of cr.m.p. without merit. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to quash and set aside the order dated 14.08.2019 passed in Cr. Revision No.94 of 2019 by the learned Sessions Judge, Giridih whereby and where under the learned Sessions Judge, Giridih dismissed the criminal revision after finding that there is no infirmity or illegality in the order dated 28.03.2019 passed by the learned J.M.-1st Class, Giridih in Complaint Case No.340 of 2014 by which the learned J.M.-1st Class, Giridih has found prima facie case to constitute the offence punishable under Section 500 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE against the petitioner.
3. The brief fact of the case is that the petitioner made false imputations concer
Accusations made intending harm to reputation do not qualify for the good faith exception under defamation law; burden of proof lies on the accuser.
The determination of the applicability of defamation exceptions requires factual evidence that cannot be conclusively resolved in pre-trial proceedings.
The court established that the intent to harm reputation is a key element of defamation under Section 499 of the IPC, and the burden of proving that an imputation falls within the Exceptions lies wit....
Defamatory statements made in good faith during legal proceedings do not constitute defamation under Section 500 IPC.
Allegations made in matrimonial proceedings may fall within the exception to defamation under Section 499 IPC, preventing issuance of process without adequate prima facie evidence.
Defamation claims require specific allegations and evidence; vague claims do not warrant criminal proceedings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
