IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
Dinesh Chandra Jha S/o Late Surya Narain Jha - Appellant
Versus
The Union of India through the C.B.I. - Respondent
Cr. M.P. No. 426 of 2023
Decided On : 25-07-2025
JUDGMENT :
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, J.
1. The instant criminal miscellaneous petition has been under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the order taking cognizance dated 02.12.2021 passed in R.C. Case No. 09(A) of 2017-D whereby and whereunder, prima facie case has been found to be made out under Section 120B read with Section 420 of IPC and Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Factual Matrix
2. The accused persons (public servants) in conspiracy with M/s Jiamusi Coal Mining Machinery Company Limited, Beijing (China) and its Indian agent cheated M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad during the period 2009 to 2016 by issuing supply order for two Road Header Machines for use in coal mining activities and making payment to the said company as well as accepting the said Machines which were not as per the technical specification, due to which, both the machines broke down / remained unutilized, resulting wrongful loss of Rs. 11.60 crores (approx.) to BCCL. Against the specification of Road Header Machines of 1.6 M, the said company supplied machines with overall height much more than specified in the NIT and supply order.
Both the machines were not accepted by the BCCL, W.J. Area, Moonidih, Dhanbad as they were not as per specification, but still the accused persons accepted the machines and made 80% payment and they tried to justify the said illegal procurement to reuse the rejected machines instead of insisting the said firm to replace or modify the machines at their cost. It was known to the accused persons that the height of machines was much higher than the available seam of coal and as such there was no way the machines could have been put to any productive use.
Accused persons failed to recommend any action against the said company or its Indian agent, who had supplied the machines, which were not as per the supply order and released 80% payment.
The Road Header Machines broke down since November, 2015 and another was with effect from 03.02.2016 due to expiry of permission time of field trial. Thus, the accused-public servants of BCCL, firm and others cheated the BCCL and caused wrongful loss to the tune of Rs. 11.60 crores (approx) and corresponding wrongful gain to themselves.
The Director, Central Vigilance Commission, New Delhi vide order No. 015/COL/051-337020 dated 17.02.2017 in exercises of powers conferred under Section 8 (1)(d) and 8(1)(h) of the C.V.C. Act, 2003 had directed the CBI to conduct an investigation into the manner of acquisition of equipment, whose specifications were altogether different from the tendered one, non-returning of such inappropriate machinery, making of payment even though the machinery delivered was not the one ordered for and other connected issues including the role of the officers, who dealt with the issue, foreign supplier, their Indian agent and others involved.
Accordingly, a first information report being R.C. Case No. 09(A) of 2017-D was registered on 22.11.2017 was instituted against the petitioner and other accused persons.
3. Accordingly, the investigation in the said case has been completed and charge-sheet dated 22.09.2021 has been submitted against the accused persons including the present petitioner under Sections 120-B, 420 of IPC and Sec. 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Cognizance of the said offence has been taken by the court concerned vide order dated 02.12.2021.
4. It is evident from the factual aspect as referred hereinabove that the petitioner along with other co-accused in criminal conspiracy with M/s Jiamusi Coal Mining Machinery Company Limited, Beijing, China and their Indian agent cheated the Bharat Coking Coal Limited (BCCL), Dhanbad during the period 2009 to 2016 by issuing supply order for 02 Road Header Machines for use in coal mining works, making payment to the said company and accepting the said machines which are not
Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v. State of Maharashtra
Rajiv Thapar and Others v. Madan Lal Kapoor
State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi
Rukmini Narvekar v. Vijaya Satardekar
Anand Kumar Mohatta v. State (NCT of Delhi), Department of Home
State of T.N. through Superintendent of Police CBI/SIT Petitioner v. Nalini and others
Bhagwan Swarup Lal Bishan Lal v. State of Maharashtra
State of M.P. v. Sheetla Sahai
The court confirmed that sufficient prima facie evidence exists to continue criminal proceedings for conspiracy and corruption, reinforcing the High Court's cautious exercise of inherent powers under....
At the stage of considering charges, the accused cannot rely on materials by way of defense, and the power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be used for a mini trial.
The court held that mere negligence by an advocate in providing legal opinions does not constitute criminal conspiracy without evidence of active participation in the fraudulent scheme.
Illegal gratification – In a case where investigation is completed, Court is not required to appreciate evidence for quashing criminal proceeding – To appreciate evidence is function of Criminal Cour....
Scrap dealer not liable under Sections 411/120-B IPC for purchasing scrap from attached premises pursuant to custodian permission and cheque payment, absent knowledge of theft or conspiracy; FIR quas....
The Court may quash criminal proceedings under inherent powers if they constitute an abuse of process, but cannot assess evidence prematurely.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that at the stage of consideration of charge, an accused cannot rely on materials by way of defense, and the power under Section 482 of the Code of....
The need for a demand or request for a valuable thing or pecuniary advantage from the public servant to establish an offence under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Criminal conspiracy – Quash of Criminal Proceedings - Exercise of power vested in it under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. Such exercise of power, besides doing justice to accused, would save precious court t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.