Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Ram Narayan Sahu @ Narayan Sahu, S/o Late Mahabir Ram Sahu @ Jugnu – Appellant
Versus
Soni Bai, W/o Late Jugnoo – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Heard learned counsel for appellants Mr. Ayush Aditya as well as learned counsel for the respondents Mr. Parth S.A. Swaroop Pati.
2. Instant second appeal has been preferred being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment dated 04.09.2014 (Decree signed on 19.09.2015) passed by learned First Appellate Court, District and Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Jamshedpur in Title Appeal No. 67 of 2007 whereby and whereunder the judgment dated 19.09.2007 (decree signed on 29.09.2007) passed by learned Additional Munsif, Jamshedpur in Title Suit No. 93 of 1991 has been affirmed. Accordingly, the suit of the plaintiff/appellants has been dismissed.
3. Factual matrix giving rise to this appeal is that the plaintiffs have filed Title Suit No. 93 of 1991 for declaration of right, title of Schedule A land and for recovery of possession so far as Scheduled-B premises concerned after vacating the defendants there from. It is alleged that the Holding No. 113B in Kashidih Basti was allotted to one Kala Ram, father of the plaintiff no.1 and after his death, the said holding was re- allotted in the name of Musamat Ful Kumari widow of Kalaram and plaintiff no.1 namel
Non-joinder of necessary parties constitutes grounds for reversing or modifying a decree, requiring the trial court to provide opportunity for amendment before final judgment.
Dismissal of a suit for non-joinder of necessary parties without providing an opportunity to the plaintiff to implead the necessary parties is not a fair procedure and is legally impermissible.
Non-joinder of a necessary party is a ground to reverse or vary a decree in appeal, and the court may order a remand to afford an opportunity to implead the necessary party.
Misjoinder of parties does not invalidate a suit against a necessary party; courts have discretion in granting specific performance based on established agreements.
The court permits the impleading of a necessary party and emphasizes complete adjudication on disputes, allowing amendments for justice despite procedural delays.
Non-joinder of necessary parties is a fatal defect that cannot be rectified at the appellate stage, as established by precedent.
Non-joinder of parties can impact the outcome of property disputes; title assessments must consider all evidence presented.
The court affirmed that a suit for declaration does not necessitate all co-owners as parties if their interests don't impede the plaintiff's claims.
A co-owner can maintain a suit for possession against a tenant without joining other co-owners, affirming that non-joinder does not render the suit bad in law.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of joining necessary parties for a complete and final decision on the matter in dispute, as well as the discretion of the court to o....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
