Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bablu Barnwal, S/o Late Jai Prakash Lal – Appellant
Versus
Niranjan Singh S/o Brinda Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. history of appeals and decrees (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. arguments regarding executability of decree (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court observations on first appellate court's confusion (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. legal standards for appellate court's authority (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. final order on execution of trial court's decree (Para 23 , 24) |
JUDGMENT :
GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
Heard, learned Counsel for the parties.
1. Petitioners are the judgment-debtors and the instant civil miscellaneous petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 19.04.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Giridih in Execution Case No. 03 of 2020 (Annexure-7), whereby and whereunder, petition under Section 47 of the CPC has been rejected.
2. Plaintiffs filed the suit for the following reliefs:
a. Declaration of right, title and interest over Schedule-B lands being part and parcel of Schedule-A lands.
b. Possession of the Plaintiffs over the suit lands be confirmed.
c. Khas vacant possession of the suit lands be recovered and delivered to the Plaintiffs by demolishing structures and constructions at
An appellate court cannot modify parts of a decree not challenged in the appeal; the executing court retains authority to enforce such unchallenged decrees.
The court ruled that an ex parte decree is defective and non-executable; both parties must have the opportunity to present their claims and evidence in a partition dispute involving jointly owned pro....
An appellate court cannot set aside a trial court's decree favoring a party without a challenge from the opposing party, ensuring the principle of finality in unchallenged judgments.
Concurrent findings of fact by the Trial Court and First Appellate Court are binding and cannot be interfered with under Section 100 of the CPC.
A proforma defendant without a decree cannot object to execution proceedings, affirming the requirement that issues must be raised during trial, not execution.
A satisfied decree cannot be amended under Section 152 of the C.P.C. as it is considered dead for all practical purposes.
Point of law: If once we accept the legal position that neither a contract for sale nor a decree passed on that basis for specific performance of the contract gives any right or title to the decree-h....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
