JUDGMENT :

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.

Heard the parties.

2. Though opposite party No.2 has put his appearance through a lawyer but no one turns up on behalf of the opposite party No.2 in spite of repeated calls.

3. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with the prayer to quash/set aside the cognizance order dated 29.09.2021 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in Doranda P.S. Case No.248 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. No.2386 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioner No.1 entered into a development agreement for development of her land by the complainant and as per which, the petitioner No.1 was supposed to get 40% of the constructed area while the remaining 60% was of the complainant. There is also allegation against the petitioners that the petitioner No.1 was having 40% share in Flat No.302 which she offered to sell to the complainant and the complainant accepted the offer and paid Rs.22,65,000/- but the petitioner No.1 has not execu