Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Nageshwar Prasad Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of factual background and context of the dispute. (Para 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding legal principles of cheating and breach of trust. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis on establishing deception and dishonesty for legal offences. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conclusion on quashing the lower court's order based on legal findings. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.
1. Heard the parties.
2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with the prayer to quash the order dated 27.09.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Giridih in connection with Complaint Case No. 343 of 2018, whereby and where under, the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Girdih has taken cognizance for the offence punishable under Section 406, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioners.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the case is fixed for evidence before charge and the next date is fixed on 24.01.2026.
4. The brief fact of the case is that the petitioner no.1 is the brother of the opposite party no.2-complainant and the petiti
To constitute cheating or criminal breach of trust, there must be deceit at inception or dishonest misappropriation; mere breach of contract without such elements does not attract IPC provisions.
The mere breach of contract does not establish a case for criminal offences of cheating or breach of trust without evidence of deception or proper entrustment.
A breach of contract does not constitute cheating unless there is initial deception; mere non-payment does not amount to criminal breach of trust.
Intention to cheat must be established from the inception of the transaction; absence of mens rea negates the offence under Section 420 IPC.
Allegations of misappropriation under IPC Sections 406 and 34 cannot proceed without evidence of entrustment and dishonest intent; mere inability to repay a loan does not constitute criminal breach o....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
