IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Vaarun Bagaria @ Varun Bagaria, S/o. Pradeep Kumar Bagaria – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.
Heard the parties.
2. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the prayer to quash the order taking cognizance dated 10.02.2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Giridih in connection with Complaint Case No.841 of 2022 corresponding to T.R. No.1100 of 2022 whereby and whereunder the learned Magistrate has found prima facie case for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code having been committed by the the petitioners and the said case is now pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Giridih.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the complainant/opposite party No.2 jointly draw the attention of this Court towards Interlocutory Application No.3760 of 2026 which is supported by the separate affidavits of petitioner Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5 as well as the complainant/opposite party No.2 of this case and submit that therein it has categorically been mentioned that with the intervention of well-wishers and friends, they have decided to resolv
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur & Others vs. State of Gujarat & Another
The court affirmed the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings based on compromise, emphasizing its application in cases predominantly of civil nature.
High Court may quash non-heinous private dispute proceedings under inherent powers where parties fully compromise, conviction becomes remote, and continuation abuses process.
High Court quashed non-heinous criminal proceedings under inherent powers due to parties' full compromise in private family dispute, remote conviction chance, and to prevent abuse of process.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings when parties reach a compromise, particularly in non-heinous offences, as continuation of proceedings may cause undue hardship.
The High Court may quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between parties if the dispute is private, not heinous, and continuation of proceedings would cause injustice.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code when a compromise between parties suggests that continuation would be unjust or oppressive, provided the offenses are not h....
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on compromise in private disputes if it serves justice and prevents abuse of process.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if a complete settlement exists between parties and the possibility of conviction is deemed remote.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure when a private dispute is settled, and the possibility of conviction is remote.
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on amicable settlement between parties, especially when the offences are not heinous and continuation would cause hardship.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.