SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Jhk) 227

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.
Mahua Maji - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand - Opposite Party
Cr.M.P. No. 243 of 2026
Decided On : 24-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh, Adv., Mr. Debopriyo Pal, Adv., Mr. Deepankar Kumar, Adv., Mr. Navneet Kumar Dhar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Devesh Krishna, SC Mines III, Mr. Kumar Pawan, SC Mines III

Cognizance of Section 223 BNS offence requires mandatory written complaint by public servant under Section 215 BNSS; absence vitiates proceedings. Unauthorized election poster affixing does not constitute undue influence or personation under Section 174 BNS.

Headnote:(A) BNSS, 2023 - Sections 215, 528 - BNS, 2023 - Sections 171, 172, 174, 223 - Criminal proceedings - Quashing - Affixing poster between government electric poles without permission during legislative assembly elections - Alleged violation of model code of conduct - Cognizance taken and substance of accusation explained for offences under Sections 223/174 BNS - Cognizance under Section 223 invalid absent written complaint by public servant or administrative superior as mandated by Section 215 BNSS, provisions being mandatory rendering prosecution void ab initio - Allegations of affixing poster do not disclose undue influence by interfering with free exercise of electoral right through threat, injury or inducement to divine displeasure, nor personation by applying for voting paper in fictitious name or voting twice - Proceedings including cognizance order quashed. (Paras 4-15)

(B) Criminal Procedure - Cognizance - Mandatory requirement of written complaint by aggrieved public servant for offences like disobedience to order under Section 223 BNS - Non-compliance vitiates entire proceedings; court cannot assume jurisdiction without it. (Paras 9-11)

Facts of the case:
Assistant Election Officer lodged report alleging poster affixed between government electric poles in public place without permission, violating model code during assembly elections. Police registered case, investigated, submitted chargesheet under Sections 223/174 BNS. Trial court took cognizance and explained substance of accusation; petitioner approached High Court under Section 528 BNSS for quashing.

Findings of Court:
Cognizance and proceedings for both offences unsustainable; entire criminal proceeding quashed and set aside.

Issues: Whether cognizance under Section 223 BNS valid without written complaint by public servant per Section 215 BNSS; whether allegations constitute undue influence or personation under Section 174 BNS.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 215 BNSS mandatory for Section 223 BNS, requiring written complaint by public servant, non-compliance vitiating prosecution as settled law; facts of unauthorized poster affixing fail to meet ingredients of undue influence (voluntary interference with electoral right via threat/injury/divine inducement) or personation (fraudulent voting).

Result: Criminal miscellaneous petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. ia for early hearing disposed as infructuous. (Para 1)
2. quashing petition against cognizance for poster violation. (Para 2 , 3)
3. s223 bns cognizance needs public servant complaint. (Para 4)
4. poster affixing not personation or undue influence. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
5. state argues allegations disclose ss223/174 offences. (Para 8)
6. s215 bnss mandatory, vitiates cognizance absent complaint. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
7. allegations insufficient for s174 bns offence. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
8. quash proceedings as abuse of process. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.

I.A. No. 2788 of 2026

Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this interlocutory application has been filed for early hearing of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition.

Since, the hearing of this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands disposed of being infructuous.

2. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 with the prayer for quashing and setting aside the entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 10.02.2025 passed by learned Special Judicial Magistrate, MP/MLA Cases, Ranchi; who has mentioned his designation as Elected MP/MLA Special Judge, Ranchi in the order dated 10.02.2025, in connection with Hindpiri P.S. case no. 122 of 2024 whereby cognizance has been taken of the offences punishable under Sections 223 / 174 of , 2023 and further prayer has been made to quash the order dated 16.04.2025 passed by the said Special Judicial Magistrate, MP/MLA Cases, Ranchi in connection with the said Hindpiri P.S. case no. 122 of 2024 which has been renumbered as MP/MLA case no. 02 of 2025 whereby and where under the substance of accusation has been explained to the petitioner for having committed the offences punishable under Section 223 / 174 of , 2023.

3. The Brief facts of the case is that the Assistant Election Officer Ranchi, 63, Assembly Constituency for the General Elections of the Legislative Assembly of the Year 2024, lodged a written report with Hindpiri Police Station alleging therein that on the application made by the candidate of the said election for Ranchi-63 Legislative Assembly constituency and the election agent of him, it was found that the poster of the petitioner, who was also a candidate for the said Ranchi-63 Legislative Assembly Elections of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, was affixed between two electric poles, belonging to the Government and the same was removed by the informant; for without any permission, in a public place the banner was affixed between the two Government electric poles, in violation of the model Code of conduct. Basing upon the written report lodged by the informant, the police registered Hindpiri P.S. case no. 122 of 2024 and took up investigation of the case. After completion of the investigation, police submitted charge sheet against the petitioner for having committed the offences punishable under Section 223 / 174 of BNS, 2023. Learned Special Judicial Magistrate, MP/MLA Cases, Ranchi vide the order dated 10.02.2025, found sufficient materials to constitute the offence punishable under Sections 223 / 174 of , 2023. On 16.04.2025, the petitioner appeared before learned Special Judicial Magistrate, MP/MLA Cases, Ranchi and learned Special Judicial Magistrate, MP/MLA Cases, Ranchi explained the substance of the accusation for the offence punishable under Section 223 / 174 of the , 2023 to the petitioner, to which, the petitioner pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that so far no witness has been examined by the prosecution before the learned Special Judicial Magistrate as yet. It is next submitted that in view of section 215 of BNSS, the cognizance of any offence inter alia under Section 223 ought not be taken by any court, except upon complaint in writing by any public servan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top