IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, ARUN KUMAR RAI
Signode India Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand, Through Labour Commissioner – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.
1. The present Appeal has been filed under Clause-10 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 19.02.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 3244 of 2023, whereby and whereunder, the learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition filed by the petitioner (appellant herein) had not interfered with the order dated 18.4.2019 passed by the respondent no.2 in Case No. GA-3/2017 and order contained in Memo No. 732/Ranchi, dated 19.4.2023 passed by Labour Commissioner, Jharkhand-cum-Appellate Authority under payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 [in short, Act] in Appeal Case No. P.G.-5 of 2019 and has held that the respondent no.3 is entitled for claim of gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
Factual Matrix
2. The brief facts of the case as per the pleadings made in the writ petition as well as impugned order needs to refer herein which reads as under:
(I) Petitioner (appellant herein) is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is manufacturer and supplier of the industrial packaging, consumables, equipment and services to its customers across the country and its operations are spread across geographical terri





Indian Medical Association vs.V.P. Shantha and others
Jeewanlal Ltd. and others vs. Appellate Authority and others
Shri Digvijay Woollen Mills Ltd. v. Mahendra Prataprai Buch
Beed District Central Coop. Bank Ltd. v. State of Maharashtrareported
M.C. Chamaraju v. Hind Nippon Rural Industrial (P) Ltd.
Poonam Devi v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 applies to all employees, including daily wage employees, and entitles them to gratuity for their entire ser....
The Payment of Gratuity Act allows claims for both statutory and contractual gratuity to be adjudicated under the same authority, ensuring employee rights are protected.
The appropriate authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 for establishments with branches in multiple states is the Central Government, rendering state authority's jurisdiction invalid.
The Gratuity Act provides overriding rights for gratuity claims that cannot be denied unless specifically exempted by law, even when alternative welfare benefits exist.
Interpreting Act unequivocally indicate that payment of gratuity would not depend upon employee filing an application before employer demanding gratuity but will have to be paid immediately on cessat....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.