SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Mad) 6

G.RAMANUJAM, T.RAMAPRASADA RAO
K. Somasundaram Pillai and others – Appellant
Versus
R. Dorairaj and others – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Sarvabhauman and T. R. Mani, for Appellant.
P. Jayaraman, for Respondent.

Ramanujam, J.- All these eight appeals which have been filed on the basis of leave granted under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, arise out of a common judgment rendered by Venkataraman, J., in 8 appeals of which 5 are Second Appeals and 3 are Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeals.

2. The Second Appeals arose out of O. S. Nos. 88 to 92 of 1968 filed for possession of certain properties, arrears of rent and future mesne profits on the file of the District Munsif, Pudukottai. The Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeals arise out of three execution petitions filed for execution of the decrees obtained in another set of three suits, O. S. Nos. 103, 104 and 106 of 1965 on the file of the same District Munsif’s Court. Since the facts are more or less identical in all these matters, it is not necessary to deal with the facts in each case. All these suits related to certain vacant sites in the village of Avidainalla Vijayapuram. It is a whole inam village taken over by the Government with effect from 15th April, 1965 under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Inam Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act XXVI of 1963, hereinafter referred to as the Act, The sites involved in these cases are


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top