1976 Supreme(Mad) 429
S.RATNAVEL PANDIAN, T.RAMAPRASADA RAO
Ranganayaki Ammal and others – Appellant
Versus
S. R. Srinivasan and others – Respondent
Advocates:
R.G. Rajan and R. Thyagarajan,for Appellants.
S. Chellaswamy, D. Sadasivan, G.N. Chary, S. Sampath Kumar, R. Subramaniam and A.P.S. Kasturirangam, for Respondents.
Ramaprasada Rao, J.-Defendants 1 and 3 to 6 appeal against the preliminary decree for partition given by the learned Subordinate Judge of Kumbakonam. Srinivasa Iyengar had two sons, Ramaswami Iyengar and Rajagopala Iyengar. They originally constituted members of a Hindu undivided family. The plaintiff is the son of Ramaswami Iyengar. The first defendant is the second wife of Ramaswamy Iyengar. The second and the third defendants are the son and daughter of Ramaswami Iyengar through his second wife. The fourth and the fifth defendants are the children of the third defendant and the 6th defendant is the husband of the third defendant. The 7th and 8th defendants are the grandchildren of Ramaswami Iyengar born to bis daughter Bhuma, who in turn was the first daughter through his first wife Padmasani Ammal. Thecaseof the plaintiff is that Srinivasa Iyengar, Ramaswami Iyengar and Rajagopala Iyengar formed a Hindu undivided family and when he was an one month child, his mother Padmasani Ammal died and since then, he was with his maternal grand father for the purpose of education. He, however, admits that his father Ramaswami Iyengar spent for his maintenance and education and even for his
Click Here to Read the rest of this document