S.PADMANABHAN
N. V. P. Pandian – Appellant
Versus
M. M. Roy – Respondent
2. According to the respondent the appellant is a building contractor and was at the relevant time constructing house No. 35, Muthu Gramani Street, Mylapore, Madras-4. He used to apply for loans to the respondent for his construction work. In 1968, the respondent was making attempts to get a seat for her son in the Madras Medical College. The appellant promised to obtain a seat for the respondent’s son in the medical college if the respondent would lend him some money. Accordingly, the respondent paid Rs. 15,000 in all to the appellant. However, her son could not get a seat in the medical college. Since the appellant had obtained the money from the respondent on-false representation he was bound to repay the same. On 8th January, 1971. he also executed Exhibit A-1 agreement undertaking to repay the money on or before 31st March, 1971. Since he. failed to make the repayment, the suit had to be filed by her for the refund of. the mo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.