S.RATNAVEL PANDIAN
S. Nachimuthu Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Chellammal and others – Respondent
2. Before mentioning the grounds mentioned by the petitioner in the affidavit filed by him, in support of this petition, it is necessary to indicate certain facts relating to the proceedings leading to this petition.
3. It is the common case that the first respondent herein viz., Sellammal filed a criminal complaint in C.C. No. 362 of 1969 on the file of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sankari, against her husband Nachimuthu Gounder (second respondent herein) and others for an offence of bigamy alleged to have been committed by the said Nachimuthu Gounder, which ultimately ended in his acquittal. Against the said order of acquittal, the first respondent Sellammal filed a criminal appeal in C.A.No. 252 of 1970 on the file of this Court. It seems that before this Court both parties entered into a compromise on 6th March, 1973 which provided, inter alia, that her husband (first respondent herein) should settle some properties in favour of his wife Sellammal
Venkatapathi v. Balappa 37 L.W. 623; I.L.R. 56 Mad. 641; A.I.R. 1933 Mad. 429 : [1933] 65 M.L.J. 146
Krishnan Asari v. Adaikkalam A.I.R. 1966 Mad. 425 : [1966] 1 M.L.J. 348
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Mohamed Naim [1964] 2 S.C.R. 363; A.I.R. 1964 S.C. 703
Raghubir Saran v. State of Bihar A.I.R. 1964 S.C. 1 : [1964] 2 S.C.J. 143
Kutumba Rao v. Venkataramiah [1950] 63 L.W. 821; A.I.R. 1951 Mad. 344 : [1956] 2 M.L.J. 336
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.