IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.S. Kailasam, CJ. and V. Balasubrahmanyan, J.
Theagaraya Chetty Educational Institutions, represented by the Managing Committee’s Secretary .....Appellant(s)
Versus
Dr. G. Madan Mohan Rao .....Respondent(s)
W.A. No. 55 of 1976,
Decided On : 30 April 1976
2. The first respondent is the Principal and Professor of Zoology in Sir Theagaraya College, Madras. On 26th May, 1975, the Committee of Management served on him a memo. of charges. He was asked to give his explanation before 1st July, 1975. The Committee of Management proposed to convene a meeting on 25th August, 1975, to consider the charges framed against him. The appellant filed a petition, ace Theagaraya Chetty Educational Institutions, represented by its Secretary and Correspondent v. University of Madras1 to quash the order of the University directing the appellant to make the Principal responsible for all admissions, and in W.M.P. No. 5607 of 1975 in W.P. No. 3872 of 1975, the first respondent obtained a stay of disciplinary procedings against him. The stay of enquiry was granted till 15th July, 1975. But the first respondent was asked to file his explanation before 1st July. 1975. On 1st July 1975, the first responden filed his explanation. The appellant withdrew W.P. No. 3872 of 1975. Soon after, the first respondent filed a suit, O.S.No. 6051 of 1975. On 25th August, 1975, for a declaration that the Constitution of the committee was illegal and for an injunction restraining the managing committee from interfering with his duties and functions as Principal. On the same date, an interim injunction was granted in I.A. No. 16649 of 1975. On 24th September, 1975, the order of injunction was vacated and I.A. No. 16649 of 1975, was dismissed. The first respondent preferred an appeal, C.M.A. No. 158 of 1975, against the dismissal of I.A. No. 16649 of 1975 and, pending that appeal, in C.M.P. No. 82 of 1975, an interim injunction was granted restraining the managing committee from holding the meeting at 4 p.m. on 26th September, lg75. The meeting of the managing committee was in fact held at 4-10 p.m. and the first respondent was suspended and the thirteenth respondent was appointed as principal in charge. Immediately, the thirteenth respondent assumed charge as principal. A little later, at 4-30 p.m. on 26th September, 1975 in C.M.P. No. 82 of 1975, the Court directed the parties So maintain the status quo as at 4-30 p.m. on 26th September, 1975.
3. The Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Ordinance, 1975 (17 of l975) was promulgated on 21st November, 1975. On 5th December, 1975, the first respondent filed C.M.P. No. 125 of 1975 in C.M.A. No. 158 of 1975 praying for leave to raise additional grounds relating to the applicability of the Ordinance. On 12th December, 1975, the first respondent filed O.S. No 9297 of 1975 for a declaration that the order dated 26th September, 1975, suspending him was inoperative and not honest. Time for counter was granted in I.A. No. 26298 of 1970 and the application was posted to 12th January, 1975. In the meantime, on 20th December, 1975, W.P. No. 7444 of 1975, out of which this writ appeal arises, was filed by the first respondent. On 5th January, 1976, C.M.A. No. 158 of 1975 and the applications filed by the first respondent were dismissed. The suit, O.S. No. 9297 of 1975, filed by the first respondent was dismissed on 2nd February, 1976. On 21st January, 1976, judgment was pronounced in W.P. No. 7444 of 1975 holding that the suspension made on 26th September, 1975, expired under the Ordinance. Aggrieved against that order, Theagaraya Chetty Educational Institutions, represented by the Managing
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.