T.RAMAPRASADA RAO, S.RATNAVEL PANDIAN
The Union of India represented by Secretary, Ministry of Works, Housing, Urban Development, New Delhi, and another – Appellant
Versus
Andhra Bank Limited, Madras-9. – Respondent
Bhawaji v. Himatlal [1972] 2 S.C.J. 174; [1972] 2 S.C.R. 890; A.I.R. 1972 S.C. 819
Hajee Mohamad v. Globe Theatres A.I.R. 1956 Mad. 216
Kuppuswami Pillai v. Md. Kasim 94 I.C. 308; [1926] M.W.N. 236; A.I.R. 1926 Mad. 566
State of West Bengal v. M/s. B. K. Mondal and Sons [1962] 1 S.C.R. (Supp.) 876; A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 779
Badrilal v. Indore Municipality [1973] 3 S.C.R. 15; A.I.R. 1973 S.C. 508
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.