SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Mad) 399

V.RAMASWAMI
M/s. Annamalai and Company, by its partner S. S. Sundaram Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Sital Achi – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Chandramouli, for Petitioner.
M. Veluswamy, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT.- The tenant who was unsuccessful in all the three Courts below is the petitioner in this revision petition. The respondent-landlady filed a petition under section 10 (3) (a) (i) and (iii) of the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, for eviction of the petitioner from her premises No. 29, Vaduga Kaval Kooda Street, Madurai Town, which was purchased by her on 22nd December, 1967 on the ground that the same is required for the purpose of residence and business of her adult married son. The facts as found by the Courts below are these. The respondent-landlady was living in a rented house with her husband. Her son with his wife and children was living in a separate rented house in door No. 3, Mahal First Street, Madurai and was also carrying on money lending business in the said premises. Besides the house in question the respondent also owned another house in Goods Shed Street, Madurai which was also under tenancy to a third party. She filed an application for eviction of the tenant in the premises in Goods Shed Street on the ground that it was required for her own residence and also for the pawn-broker’s business of her husband. The petition filed in respect


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top