P.S.KAILASAM, N.S.RAMASWAMI
Murugan – Appellant
Versus
Jayarama Pillai and others – Respondent
2. The terms of Exhibit A-1 are that the property in question was sold for a sum of Rs. 3,826-50, consisting of five items of consideration, and the property would be reconveyed if the vendors (the plaintiffs in the suit) repaid the said sum of Rs. 3,826-50 after five years and
Chunchun Jha v. Sheik Ebadat Ali
P. L. Bapuswami v. N. Pattay Gounder [1966] 2 S.C.R. 918; [1967] 1 S.C.J 842; A.I.R. 1966 S.C. 902
Kulathu Iyer v. Manickavasagam Pillai [1956] L.W. 548 : [1956] 1 M.L.J. 385
S. A. Khan v. Nawaz Khan [1956] L.W. 546 : (i956] I M.L.J. 388
Bhoju Mandal v. Dhebnath Bhagat [1963] 2 S.C.J 676; A.I.R. 1963 S.C. 1906
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.