SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 521

T.V.MASILAMANI
R. Radha – Appellant
Versus
B. Saraswathy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For The Petitioner:G. Annamalai, Advocate. For The Respondent:V. Sathyanarayana, Advocate.

Judgment :-

The petitioner has preferred this Civil Revision Petition against the order passed by the X Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Madras in E.A.No.138 of 1996 in E.P.No.2022 of 1985 in O.S.No.4683 of 1982 dated 25.11.1997.

2. The respondent/decree holder obtained an exparte decree dated 9.11.1982 against the petitioner herein in O.S.No.4683 of 1982 for specific performance of an agreement of sale and proceeded to execute the decree in E.P.No.2022 of 1985. The executing court having considered the rival contentions of the parties ordered delivery of the property. Since the warrant was returned on account of obstruction, the respondent filed applications in E.A.No.3675 of 1985 for removable of superstructure put up by the obstructors and delivery of possession, E.A.No.3676 of 1985 for police aid and E.A.No.3677 of 1985 for direction to break open the lock. Afterwards, as per the orders of the executing court, the property was delivered 6.9.1985 after removal of the superstructure with police aid and the petition was closed.

3. Subsequently, the respondent/decree holder filed the application in E.A.No.1684 of 1994 for delivery of possession of the property for the second time o










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top