K.SAMPATH
Kanakamma – Appellant
Versus
Kamalan – Respondent
1. The decree holder in O.S. No. 121 of 1986 on the file of the District Munsif s Court, Kuzhithurai, is the revision petitioner. She obtained a decree against the respondent herein on 29. 1989 for declaration and injunction restraining her from entering the suit property and putting up any construction or building. She filed E.P. No. 124 of 1990 under Order 21, Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure alleging that the respondent in defiance of the decree against her committed trespass upon the suit property and put up a shed and a building and she had to be therefore removed from the property, the construction demolished and the respondent arrested. The respondent could not be served and therefore paper publication was effected; she was called absent; set ex parte and delivery was ordered after demolition on 12. 1992. The delivery was to be effected by 1. 1993. The delivery was also effected as per the direction of the Court on 112. 1992.
2. Thereafter, the decree holder/revision petitioner filed a fresh execution petition in E.P. No. 120 of 1995 alleging that the respondent, after the decree had been executed on 22. 1995 in violation of the decree, entered the property
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.