SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Mad) 470

S.R.SINGHARAVELU
Rathinasamy – Appellant
Versus
Jayalakshmi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For The Petitioner:N. Damodaran, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This Criminal Revision Petition arises against the order dated 18.02.2005 in Crl.M.P.No.156 of 2005 in C.C.No.295 of 2002 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No. I, Thiruppur.

2. There was proceedings for an offence under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, in which the present revision petitioner was the complainant. Respondent/accused wanted to examine an Income Tax Officer with production of such record as witness on her side. The trial court also issued summons and in accordance with the summons, the Officials were also present in court. It is at that time, this revision petitioner / complainant filed an application requesting the Court to withdraw the summons on the ground that income tax records is immune from submitting into Court.

3. Regarding that immunity, the attention of the Court was drawn to the following observation made in the decision reported in M/s. DAGI RAM PINDI LALL ..vs.. TRILOK CHAND JAIN (AIR 1992 SC 990)".

"When a Court of law, in any matter pending before it desires the production of record relating to any assessment after applying its judicial mind and hearing the parties and on being prima facie satisfied that the record required to be su


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top