R.BANUMATHI
Rajaji – Appellant
Versus
R. Krishnaji – Respondent
This revision is preferred against the Fair and Decretal Order made in I.A.No.540/2001 in I.A.No.283/2001 in O.S.No.34/2000 dated 2.11.2001 by the Subordinate Judge, Maduranthakam, dismissing the petition filed under Or.9, R.7 CPC declining to set aside the exparte order to appointment of Receiver passed in I.A.No.283/2001.
2.The Plaintiffs/Defendants 1 and 2 - sons of D-3 – Raja Ram Reddiar, claim that the suit properties 'A to E' schedule properties are the ancestral properties. The Plaintiff has filed the suit O.S.No.34/2000 for partition and allotment of 1/4th share. The suit property relates to a number of items of immovable properties comprised in A to E Plaint Schedule Properties.
3.Defendants 1 to 3 have filed Written Statement. D-1 has filed the Written Statement contending that the Preliminary Decree for partition could be passed in respect of the suit properties excepting 'B' Schedule Property, which is to be allotted as three equal shares and 'C' schedule in four equal shares and that D-1 is entitled to 1/3rd share in 'B' Schedule and 1/4th share in 'C' Schedule. D-2 has filed Written Statement stating that the suit may be decreed as prayed for and that the se
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.