SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 327

R.JAYASIMHA BABU, N.V.BALASUBRAMANIAN
R. Kasthuri – Appellant
Versus
R. Raveendran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Mr.Sundar, Advocate. For the Respondents:Mr.AR.L.Sunderesan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

N.V.BALASUBRAMANIAN, J.

This Letters Patent appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge in C.M.A.No.517 of 1995. The appellant herein is the wife and the respondent is her husband.

2. The husband filed a petition under section 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act on the file of District Court, Sivaganga against his wife praying for the custody of their child. The petitioner and the respondent were married in the year 1986, and one male child was born on 11.4.1988. It is the case of the husband that at the instigation of the mother and brother of his wife, misunderstanding arose between them and the wife left the matrimonial home on 2.7.1991 taking the child with her. Subsequently, some mediators intervened to resolve the dispute and the dispute was resolved and she came back to the matrimonial home to join her husband on 13.4.1991 and lived with him. She again left the matrimonial home on 2.7.1991 taking the child with her. The husband filed H.M.O.P.No.8 of 1991 on the file of Subordinate Judge's Court, Devakottai for restitution of conjugal rights. On 14.9.1992, both the parties filed a joint endorsement before the Court and on the basis of the joint













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top