SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 680

V.KANAGARAJ
K. M. Kannu Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Mahboob Ali Sahib & Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:For the Petitioner:Mr.V.Lakshmi Narayanan, Advocate. For the Respondents:Mr.R.Selvakumar, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the fair and decretal order dated 22.02.1996 made in E.P.No.34 of 1993 in O.S.No.164 of 1992 by the Court of Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri, thereby dismissing the execution petition filed by the petitioner herein who is the decree-holder, without costs.

2. Tracing the history of the case, it comes to be known that the petitioner was the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.164 of 1992 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Dharmapuri, and the same was decreed exparte as prayed for on 16.6.1993, against which, on the part of the respondents, no steps have been initiated to set aside the decree, as a result of which, ultimately, the decree holder, the petitioner herein, has filed the above execution petition with averments that the respondents have house and landed properties worth Rs.1 lakh and that by means of business, they are having an income of Rs.60,000/= per annum and further that they are having a sum of Rs.50,000/= in cash and that they have the capacity to repay the said amount and in spite of it, since they did not come forward to settle the decree amount for causing the arrest of the respondents and keeping t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top