SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Mad) 1641

V.KANAGARAJ
A. Chetty – Appellant
Versus
A. Rangan – Respondent


Advocates:
Valliappan, for M/s.Sarvabhuman Associates, for Petitioner.

ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the fair and decretal order dated 6.9.2001 made in E.P. No.53 of 2000 in O.S. No.340 of 1995 by the Court of District Munsif, Dharmapuri thereby allowing the application filed by the plaintiff under O.21, Rules 22, 37 and 38 seeking arrest and detention in the civil prison of the petitioner herein.

2. Tracing the history of the case, it comes to be known that the respondent herein who is the plaintiff is the decree-holder in the suit in O.S. No.340 of 1995 wherein the decree amount is Rs.18,204; that the revision petitioner has got property worth Rs.75,000 which is fetching income of Rs.2,000 per year; that he is receiving a salary of Rs.7,000 per month and in spite of having the capacity to pay the decree amount, he has failed to do the same and hence praying for arrest and detention in civil prison.

3. In the counter filed before the lower Court the revision petitioner/ respondent denied the allegations of the petition that he has got properties valued at Rs.75,000 and on that annual income is Rs.2,000 having monthly income of Rs.7,000 and inspite of having such income he is not paying the decree amount. He would further alleg






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top