V.KANAGARAJ
A. Chetty – Appellant
Versus
A. Rangan – Respondent
2. Tracing the history of the case, it comes to be known that the respondent herein who is the plaintiff is the decree-holder in the suit in O.S. No.340 of 1995 wherein the decree amount is Rs.18,204; that the revision petitioner has got property worth Rs.75,000 which is fetching income of Rs.2,000 per year; that he is receiving a salary of Rs.7,000 per month and in spite of having the capacity to pay the decree amount, he has failed to do the same and hence praying for arrest and detention in civil prison.
3. In the counter filed before the lower Court the revision petitioner/ respondent denied the allegations of the petition that he has got properties valued at Rs.75,000 and on that annual income is Rs.2,000 having monthly income of Rs.7,000 and inspite of having such income he is not paying the decree amount. He would further alleg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.