SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 471

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
Perumal – Appellant
Versus
Rajamanickam & Another – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: For the Appellant:Mrs.N.Krishnaveni, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr.P.Valliappan for M/s.Sarvabhuman Associates.

Judgment :-

Perumal, the defendant is the appellant herein.

2. The respondents filed a suit for declaration of title and for permanent injunction in respect of suit property. After trial, the learned District Munsif dismissed the suit. Aggrieved by the same, the respondents filed an appeal before the District Judge, Trichy. After hearing both the parties, the learned District Judge had reversed the judgment of the Trial Court and decreed the suit. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant has come forward with this Second Appeal.

3. According to the plaintiffs/respondents, they are brothers and the suit property was originally belonged to Irulayee Ammal, their grandmother. On 25.7.1975, the said Irulayee Ammal settled the suit property measuring about 24 cents in favour of the plaintiffs/respondents by way of a gift deed. From then onwards, the suit property has been in possession and enjoyment of the plaintiffs. On 5.5.1976, Iyyamperumal, the junior paternal uncle of the plaintiffs obtained another gift deed in respect of 12 cents out of the 24 cents by making mis-representation. On the basis of that, there was disturbance to the possession and enjoyment of the property. The said Iyyamp














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top