High Court of Judicature at Madras
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. JAYASIMHA BABU & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE PRABHA SRIDEVAN
Kumar (Minor) - Appellant
Versus
National Insurance Co.Ltd.and Others - Respondents
L.P.A. No. 4 to 7 of 1999
Decided On : 23 October 2002
Driving Licence - Liability of Insurer - Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Section 2(9), Section 2(9-A), Section 2(5-A), Section 3, Section 96(2)(b) - The court discussed the definitions of 'heavy goods vehicle' and 'heavy passenger motor vehicle' as found in Sections 2(9) and 2(9-A) of the Vehicles Act, 1939. The court emphasized that the driving licence issued for a particular type of vehicle is a prerequisite for driving that vehicle in any public place. The judgment highlighted the importance of possessing a valid and effective driving licence specific to the class of vehicle being driven, as per Section 3 of the Act. The court also referred to the condition in the insurance policy under Section 96(2)(b) of the Act, which excludes driving by a person who is not duly licensed for the vehicle being driven. The judgment emphasized that the possession of a licence for a heavy passenger vehicle does not authorize the driving of a heavy goods vehicle, as they are distinct categories under the Act.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant's lorry, driven by a person without a licence for a heavy goods vehicle, was involved in an accident resulting in the death of four employees and injury to another. The Tribunal awarded compensation to the legal representatives of the deceased, holding the insurer and the insured liable. The owner appealed after the single Judge absolved the insurance company from liability.
Finding of the Court:
The court dismissed the owner's appeal and permitted the claimants to withdraw the compensation amount deposited by the insurer, emphasizing the lapse of more than fifteen years since the accident and the entitlement of the claimants to relief under the law.
Issues: Liability of the insurer to pay compensation, validity of the driver's licence for the vehicle being driven, and the delay in providing relief to the claimants.
Ratio Decidendi: The possession of a valid and effective driving licence specific to the class of vehicle being driven is a prerequisite for driving that vehicle in any public place, as per Section 3 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The possession of a licence for a heavy passenger vehicle does not authorize the driving of a heavy goods vehicle, as they are distinct categories under the Act.
Final Decision: The owner's appeal was dismissed, and the court permitted the claimants to withdraw the compensation amount deposited by the insurer. The court decreed in favor of the insurer and against the owner for the deposited amount, allowing the insurer to execute the decree against the owner if the claimants are entitled to any amount in excess of the deposited sum.
R.JAYASIMHA BABU, J.
The appellant in all these appeals is the owner of the lorry involved in the accident. On 23.7.1987, the lorry was carrying steel rods and some employees of the appellant. The 6th respondent in L.P.A.No.4 of 1999, who has since been given up, was the driver. He drove the lorry in a rash and negligent manner when he took a turn, which resulted in the death of four employees, who travelled in the lorry and injury to another. The Tribunal awarded compensation to the legal representatives of the deceased, making the insurer and the insured liable to pay the compensation. On appeal, the learned single Judge absolved the insurance company from liability to pay compensation and, therefore, the owner of the lorry has filed the present appeal.
2. The principal contention advanced for the owner is that the driver of the vehicle, the vehicle admittedly being a lorry, was in possession of a licence which permitted him to drive heavy passenger vehicles and, therefore, the driver should be regarded as having possessed a licence to drive the lorry as well. Reliance is placed on the definitions of 'heavy goods vehicle' and 'heavy passenger motor vehicle' as found in Sections 2 (9) and 2 (9-A), respectively, of the Vehicles Act, 1939. "Heavy goods vehicle" is defined to mean any goods vehicle, the registered laden weight of which, or a tractor the unladen weight of which exceeds 11,000 kilograms. "Heavy passenger motor vehicle" is defined to mean any public service vehicle or omnibus the registered laden weight of either of which, or a motor car the unladen weight of which exceeds 11,000 kilograms. It was submitted that as these two vehicles are equally weighty, the ability to drive one would necessarily imply the ability to drive the other. The driver, therefore, according to the submission, is to be regarded as competent to drive the heavy goods vehicle as also the heavy passenger motor vehicle and the fact that the licence did not specify heavy goods vehicle as one of the vehicles which the driver was licensed to drive should not make a difference.
3. The argument so advanced is only superficially attractive. The scheme of the Act leaves no manner of doubt that the driving licence which is a pre-requisite for driving a motor vehicle in any public place is the driving licence issued in accordance with the provisions of the Act. 'Driving Licence' is defined in Section 2 (5-A) as meaning, "the document issued by a competent authority under Chapter II, authorising the person specified therein to drive a motor vehicle or a motor vehicle of any specified class or description". Section 3 of the Act imposes an embargo on any person driving a motor vehicle in any public place "unless he holds an effective driving licence issued to himself authorising him to drive the vehicle". That Section further provides that "no person shall so drive a motor vehicle as a paid employee or shall so drive a transport vehicle unless his driving licence specifically entitles him to do so".
4. The Supreme Court, in the case of Ashok Gangadhar Maratha -vs- Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., (1999) 6 SCC 620, after referring to Section 3, explained it's import thus:-
"This Section uses two expressions, namely. "Motor vehicle" and "effective driving licence". "Effective" would mean a valid licence both as regards the period and type of vehicle".
The driving licence which the driver is required to hold when the motor vehicle is used in a public place is the licence to drive the particular type of vehicle and not merely the licence to drive any other type of vehicle. The classification of vehicles in the Act is such that though the heavy passenger vehicle as also the heavy goods vehicle are transport vehicles, nevertheless they form distinct categories and the licence which a person intending to drive these vehicles is required to obtain is a licence issued with reference to the particular class of vehicle. A licence issued which permits the drivin
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.