M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
Banumathi @ Karunaiammal – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Athanari & Others – Respondent
Banumathi, third party filed a claim petition under Order 21 Rule 97 and 101 read with 47(1)(3) and Section 151 of C.P.C. to declare that the 'A' Schedule property is her absolute property and also to grant an order of stay of the execution petition in E.P.No.70 of 1989 filed by the L.Rs. of the decree-holder in O.S.No.1306 of 1981. The same was dismissed. Hence, this civil revision petition.
2. According to the petitioner, she purchased the suit property from Guruval, the fourth respondent herein for a valid consideration on 26.4.1999. From that date onwards, she is in actual possession and enjoyment of the property. She has also obtained E.B. service connection and is also paying water tax and house tax to the Panchayat. She came to know that decree has been passed in O.S.No.1306 of 1981 in respect of the suit property. In pursuance of the orders in the execution petition, there is a disturbance to her possession by the Court Amin. So, in order to avoid the dispossession in pursuance of the decree, she filed an application under Order 21 Rule 97 and Section 47 of C.P.C. to declare her right in the 'A' Schedule property and to grant stay of the execution proceedings. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.