PRABHA SRIDEVAN
Elanthammal and another – Appellant
Versus
Alagar and another – Respondent
2. According to the averments in the petition filed in the Court below, the shops subject matter of the civil revision petition at 28th Cross Street, Indira Nagar, Adyar, Chennai-20, were allotted to the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 respectively. They had put up their own construction, obtained electricity connection and had been carrying on the business. The allotment was made to the first petitioner to put up a mechanical shed and to the second petitioner to put up a wet grinder. The first respondent filed W.P.No.10700 of 1989 where one Ganapathy Automobiles, one V.K.G. Durai and one Meena Auto Works were made the sixth, seventh and eighth respondents and the prayer was for a mandamus to abate the nuisance caused by them. The writ petition was ordered by this Court on 19.9.1998 directing the said respondents to apply for license from the Corporation to carry on their workshop and other business and obtain orders from the Corporation. In the order passed in the writ petition it was stated that the respondents had paid the license fee. Therefore,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.