A.P.SHAH, K.CHANDRU
Consumer Action Group rep. by its Trustee Tara Murali – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government & Others – Respondent
Common Order
A.P. Shah, J.
W.P.Nos.18898 of 2000, 19998 of 2001 and 24316 of 2002 have been filed by the Consumer Action Group challenging the constitutional validity of the amended provisions of Section 113-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971, hereinafter be referred to as 'the Act’ as also the Application, Assessment and Collection of Regularisation Fee (Chennai Metropolitan Area) Rules, 1999, hereinafter be referred to as 'the Rules'.
2. Section 113-A was introduced through the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning (Amendment) Act, 1998 (Tamil Nadu Act 58 of 1998), whereby the Government is empowered, on an application being made by the person affected, to exempt any land or building developed immediately before the date of commencement of this Amending Act, from all or any of the provisions of the Act or Rules or Regulations made thereunder, by collecting regularisation fee at such rate not exceeding Rs.2,000/- per square metre. The constitutional validity of Section 113-A was upheld by the Supreme Court in Consumer Action Group -Vs- State Of Tamil Nadu ((2000) 7 Scc 425) as a one-time measure. By the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning (Amendment)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.