M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
State Represented By Inspector Of Police – Appellant
Versus
Mrs. Renukadevi – Respondent
Crl. R.C. No. 318/98 and Crl. R.C. No. 334/98 are being disposed of by this common order, as the issues and the parties in both the matters are the same.
2. By the order dated 10-2-98, the learned Principal Special Judge, for C.B.I. Cases, Chennai allowed Crl. M.P. Nos. 206 and 207 of 1997 and directed the C.B.I., the petitioner herein to return the documents seized which are mentioned as Item Nos. 45, 46, 47, 53, 77, 79 to 82 and 84 in the search list prepared at the time of seizure imposing some conditions. This order is sought to be challenged before this Court in both these Revisions by the Inspector of Police SPE/CBI/ACB, Chennai.
3. The brief facts are as follows :-
(a) On 3-9-97 one Radhakrishnan, the husband of the respondent Renukadevi, while working as U.D.C. at the office of the Director, Board of Apprentice Training, Taramani, Chennai, accepted the bribe amount of Rs. 2,000/- from one Manimaran, a diploma holder in Mechanical Engineering, as a motive or reward for the recruitment of Apprentice in the State Transport Corporation and the C.B.I. police arrested him and a case was registered in R.C. No. 52(A)/97 under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Ac
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.