ABDUL HADI, P.SATHASIVAM
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
M. Shah Jehan – Respondent
This civil miscellaneous appeal under Section 54 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to the as 'the Act') is against the order dated 5-11-1984 of the Appellate Board under the said Act, modifying the order dated 9-8-1982 of the first Authority viz., the Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate Madras 6
2. There were three contraventions under the Act, one under Section 9(1)(b), another under Section 9(1)(d) and yet another under Section 9(1)(e) of the Act. But even according to learned Counsel for the appellant, in this appeal we are concerned only with the contravention under Section 9(1)(b) by the respondent. Regarding the same, the first Authority levied penalty of Rs. 5, 000/- under Section 50 of the Act and also confiscated under Section 63 of the Act, the sum of Rs. 50, 000/- involved in the contravention, which was actually seized on 15-2-1982. But, the abovesaid modification made by the Appellate Board in the appeal preferred before it by the respondent is that while it increased the abovesaid penalty from Rs. 5, 000/- to Rs. 20, 000/- adopting the procedure prescribed under Section 52(5) of the Act, it set aside the order of the ab
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.