SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Mad) 281

M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
Kamatchi and Another – Appellant
Versus
Veluchamy – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:M. Sathya Narayanan, P. Radhakrishnan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

The 1st Petitioner/wife Smt. Kamatchi filed a petition for maintenance against her husband in M.C. No. 247/77 on the file of the Judl. Magistrate No. 1, Ramanathapuram, claiming maintenance for herself and for her two children claiming Rs. 200/- p.m. for herself and Rs. 50/- p.m. each for her children.

2. On 28-2-1978, after an elaborate enquiry, the learned Magistrate passed an order, granting maintenance of Rs. 30/- p.m. to the wife, to a sum of Rs. 70/- p.m. After a lapse of 8 years, since the petitioner/wife felt that the maintenance awarded in the year 1978 was not sufficient to meet the expenditure, she filed another petition on 17-11-86 in Crl.M.P. No. 6770-A/86 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No. I, Ramanathapuram, claiming for enhancement of maintenance to Rs. 250/- p.m. for herself and Rs. 200/- for her son and since the daughter got married, the petitioner did not claim any maintenance for the daughter. On this petition, the respondent/husband was summoned and opportunity was given by the lower Court for production of materials to prove their respective contentions. Ultimately on 9-4-91 i.e., after 5 years, the learned Magistrate passed an order enhanci














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top