SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Mad) 6

S.S.SUBRAMANI
Raju Pillai and Others – Appellant
Versus
V. P. Paramasivan and Others – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:Hema Sampth, T.M. Hariharan, Advocates.

Judgment :-

This Revision is filed by the respondents 1 to 4 and 7 in I.A. No. 156 of 1989 in unnumbered O.S. of 1989. The said I.A. was filed by the respondents herein, seeking permission to institute the suit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The reliefs prayed for in the proposed suit are: (1) For permission to the plaintiffs to institute and prosecute the suit in a representative capacity; (2) that a scheme to framed for proper management of the properties and the affairs of the plaintiffs community; (3) for a direction to the defendants to deliver possession of the suit property to the plaintiffs' community represented by its office bearers appointed under the Scheme or represented by the plaintiffs themselves; (4) for a direction to the defendants 1 to 3 to render a true and correct account of their management of the properties and affairs of the plaintiffs' community, to the community represented by its office bearers appointed under a Scheme or represented by the plaintiffs; and (5) for other consequential reliefs.

3. In the proposed suit to be filed, the plaintiffs have sought for permission under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which is a condit















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top