SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Mad) 807

THANGAMANI
Ganesan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:For the Petitioner:M. Karnaga Vinavagam, Advocate. For the Respondent:A.N. Rajan Govt. Advocate.

Judgment :-

Petition under section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records in Cr. No. 1314/89 on the file of Central Crime Branch, Egmore and quash the proceedings therein.

2. Petitioner Ganesan is doing business in electronic goods in the name and style of Sivasakti Electronics at No. 23, Narasingapuram street, Mount Road, Madras. On 10-11-1989 he laid a complaint before the Central Crime Branch, Egmore, Madras against one Kasim, Ismail and Akbar alleging that on 7-10-1989 one Arumugam came to his shop and represented that TV picture tubes were available for sale at No. 48, Vaithinantha Mudali street, Mint, Madras. He also gave out that one Kasim, Ismail and Akbar are his partners. Pursuant to this, he proceeded to this shop along with one Srinivasan and another. He wanted to place the order for the picture tubes only on behalf of the said Srinivasan. In the house at Vaithianatha Mudali street, Arumugam introduced Kasim, Ismail and Akbar to him. He negotiated and fixed the price of 50 picture tubes at Rs. 1,15,000/-. He got Rs. 1,15,000/- from the said Srinivasan and handed it over to them. When he demanded receipt for the same, he was told that the goods as well as the receipt would
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top