SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(Mad) 316

A.S.ANAND, SOMASUNDARAM
Reliance Motor Company Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:C. Natarajan, Mrs. Chitra Venkataraman, Advocates.

Judgment :-

DR. A. S. ANAND, C.J.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the Joint Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Madras, made in exercise of the powers under section 34 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, hereinafter referred to as "the Act".

2. Learned counsel for the assessee has, before questioning the order on merits, raised two preliminary objections to the order of the Joint Commissioner. According to him, firstly the Joint Commissioner failed to appreciate that the turnover of Rs. 1, 84, 985 was allegedly the escaped turnover, which was neither part of the return nor of the book sales or even the subject-matter of the appeal before the appellate authority, and the Joint Commissioner could not, in exercise of the powers under section 34 of the Act bring to tax, for the first time, the alleged escaped turnover while exercising suo motu revisional powers. Secondly, it was argued that the order of the Joint Commissioner was barred by limitation prescribed under section 16 of the Act to bring an escaped turnover to tax.

3. With a view to appreciate the preliminary objections, a short reference to the facts of the case is necessary. The appellant wa


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top