NAINAR SUNDARAM, MARUTHAMUTHU
P. Vidhyavathi and others – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Government Estate, Madras-2 and others – Respondent
Nainar Sundaram, J.:
These writ petitions are by the non-selectees with regard to of District Munsif, hereinafter called the posts, the selection in respect, of which was May-June, 1988. The non-selectees in the case of W.P.Nos.7480, 7518, 7993, 8166, and 8708 of 1988 are the members of the Bar. The non-selectees in the W.P.Nos.8834 of 1988 and 162 of 1989 are service candidates. The quota for the Bar out of 128 vacancies; the balance 58 vacancies having had been required to be filled recruitment by transfer from amongst service candidates.
2. The grounds of attack or in other words, the grounds of grievance over the non are being expressed in the following manner: Firstly, it is contended that during the interview or oral examination, held for the selection for the posts, the Chairman of Nadu Public Service Commission, hereinafter referred to as the Commission, was not at all, he having gone on leave and on account of the absence of the Chairman Commission, the selection process gone through oral examination, was incompetent stood vitiated. There is a controversy with reference to the actual period during Chairman of the Commission went on leave. But, that aspect is no
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.