SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Mad) 362

MOHAN, S.RAMALINGAM
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Asia Tobacco Company Limited – Respondent


Appearing Advocates:C. Krishnan, Habibulla Badsha, S. Subramaniam, Advocates.

Judgment :-

S. RAMALINGAM, J

These writ appeals are against the common order made in W.P. Nos. 6048, 6049 and 6050 of 1984.

2.The facts of the case are as follows:- The respondent in the writ appeals, who is the petitioner in the writ petitions and who, for the sake of uniformity, will hereinafter be referred as to the petitioners manufactures cigarettes on which excise duty is payable. By an exemption Notification No. 30/79-Central Excise, dated 1-3-1979, made under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government exempted cigarettes falling under a particular description from so much of the duty of excise leviable thereon, as is in excess of the duty specified in the corresponding entry in Column (2) of the Notification. The petitioner had the benefit of this exemption Notification and was clearing the manufactured cigarettes on payment of the concessional excise duty.

3.However, by a Notification No. 284/82-C.E., dated 30-11-1982, hereinafter referred to as the withdrawal Notification, the earlier Notification No. 30/79-Central Excise, dated 1-3-1979 was rescinded.

4.On a demand being made for payment of full excise duty without any concession for the period between









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top