SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Cal) 395

SUDHIR RANJAN ROY
GENERAL FIBRE DEALERS LTD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOKE CHAKRABORTY, Bhaskar Gupta, N.C.ROY CHAUDHARY

SUDHIR RANJAN ROY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner No. 1 is a company carrying on business of, inter alia, importing and manufacturing various goods. The petitioner No. 2 is a share holder of petitioner No. 1.

( 2 ) BY a notification dated April 18, 1980, issued under Section 25 (1) of the Customs Act, 1962, the Central Government exempted Aluminium scrap when imported into India from so much of the Customs duty leviable thereon which is specified in the First Schedule of the Customs Tariff Act as in excess of 35% ad valorem of customs duty leviable thereon.

( 3 ) BY a further notification dated January 1, 1981 the aforesaid exemption from basic Customs duty and additional duty was extended upto and inclusive of the 31st March, 1981.

( 4 ) RELYING on the aforesaid notification the petitioner No. 1 entered inter alia into two separate contracts for purchase of Aluminium scrap from foreign sellers.

( 5 ) THE ship carrying two consignments of Aluminium scrap entered into the territorial waters of India and docked at Calcutta on 5th January, 1981.

( 6 ) ON such arrival of the ship the petitioners filed two separate Bills of Entry for warehousing the said scrap.

( 7 ) THEREAFTER on or ab

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top