SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Mad) 1

NATARAJAN
Chinnasamy – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu and Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:R. Raghupathy, N. Dhinakar, Govt., (Crl. Side), Advocates.

Judgment :-

NATARAJAN, J.

A convicted prisoner has filed this writ petition through the good offices of the Madras District Committee for Legal Aid and Advice. The petition raises an interesting question of law, viz., whether a person who has been convicted in a plurality of cases on the same day and sentenced to undergo sentences of imprisonment concurrently, can claim the benefit of remission of the period of pre-trial detention under S. 428, Cr.P.C. in respect of all the cases.

2. The brief facts which require mention are as follows : The petitioner was arrested on 19-4-1982 by the third respondent for offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380, I.P.C. Charge-sheets were filed against the petitioner in three cases under Sections 457 and 380, I.P.C. They were taken on file as C.C. Nos. 506, 507 and 508 of 1982 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate No. II. Vellore. The petitioner was in remand from 19-4-1982. On 29-9-1982 the plea of guilt entered by the petitioner in all the three cases was accepted and he was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months in each case. The sentences were, however, directed to run concurrently. The learned




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top