SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Mad) 167

NAINAR SUNDARAM
Chettimai C. Nanjappa Chettiar (deceased by L. R. ) – Appellant
Versus
S. N. Kuppuswami Chettiar – Respondent


Advocates:
T.L. Ram Mohan, for Appellants; C. Ramanathan and V. Nicholas, Govt. Advocate (for No. 4), for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- The plaintiff in O.S. No.13 of 1973 on the file of the subordinate Judge of Coimbatore, originally preferred this appeal. The original appellant died pending the appeal and his legal representative being his son is on record as the appellant. The respondents in the appeal are the defendants in the suit. The suit was laid under S.70 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, XXII of 1959. to set aside the order dated 13-10-1972 of the fourth defendant in A. P. No. 40 of 1971 and to declare that the plaintiff is the hereditary trustee of the Ellai Chandi Vinayakar Temple in Coimbatore. The entire gamut of the facts need not be set out in this judgment for the simple reason, the controversy has boiled down to a particular aspect as to whether hereditary trusteeship, which was admittedly in existence, was lost by relinquishment as reasoned by the fourth defendant in his order and which has found countenance before the Court below. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree of the Court below when it dismissed the suit of the plaintiff.

2. The temple is admittedly a public temple, Equally so, it is admitted that the trusteeship of t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top