SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(SC) 32

M.C.MAHAJAN, N.CHANDRASHEKAR AIYAR, B.K.MUKHERJEE, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Angurbals Mullick – Appellant
Versus
Debabrata Mullick – Respondent


Advocates:
B.Banerji, B.SEN, BAKSHI TEK CHAND, GANPAT RAI, P.K.BOSH, S.BANERJEE, S.C.ROY

Judgment

Mukherjea J.- This appeal is directed against an appellate judgment of the Calcutta H. C., dated 19-5-1950, which affd, the judgment of a single Judge of the Original Side of that Ct. passed on 9- 2-1949, in Suit No. 2481 of 1947.

2. The pltf. who is the applt, before us, is the widow of one Mrityunjoy Mullick, & wealthy Hindu resident of Calcutta, while the deft. who is still an infant, is the only son of Mrityunjoy born of his first wife Kiranbala, who died during the lifetime of her husband. The controversy between the parties centres round the short point as to whether the pltf, is entitled, after the death of her husband, to act as shebait of an idol named Sree Sree Nittogopal Jew founded by Mrityunjoy & his mother, either solely or jointly with the deft. her stepson.

3. To appreciate the points that have been canvassed before us in this appeal, it will be necessary to narrate a few antecedent fact about which there is no dispute between the parties. It may be stated here that neither side adduced any evidence before the trial Judge during the hearing of the case & the questions raised up the suit were argued as questions of law turning on the construction of the inde
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top