SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Mad) 391

DAVID ANNOUSSAMY, V.RAMASWAMI
Bank of Madurai Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Balaramadass and Brothers – Respondent


Advocates:
Somayajee of M/s. Aiyar and Dolia, for Plaintiff; K. V. Rajan, for Defendants.

Judgement

DAVID ANNOUSSAMY, J.: - This is an order of reference from a learned single Judge of this Court on the point of jurisdiction.

2. The suit is one on equitable mortgage by the deposit of title deeds for sale of the immovable property situated in Ooty, outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Court. The mortgage by deposit of title deeds was created at Madras and all the defendants reside in Madras. It was contended by the defendants that this Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. The plaintiff retorted that a suit on mortgage for sale of the mortgage property was not a suit for land and that, therefore, was within the jurisdiction of this Court.

3. The controversy between the parties, therefore, turned oh the point whether a suit on mortgage for sale of the mortgaged property was one for land or not. The learned single Judge after reviewing the position of law on this question found that he could not agree with the view taken recently by another single Judge, in the State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. v. Arvind Distillery and Chemicals Ltd., (1982) 1 Mad LJ 188: (AIR 1982 Mad 273). Consequently, he passed an order referring the above questi






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top