SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Mad) 10

RAMANUJAM
A. Gopalkrishna Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
T. K. A. Yakub Hussain – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Chandramouli, for Petitioner, N. Shankaravadivelu, for Respondent.

Judgement

ORDER :- This revision is directed against the order of the Sub Court, Kumbakonam in C. M. A. No. 5 of 1982, setting aside the order of eviction passed by the Rent Controller against the respondent herein at the instance of the petitioner herein.

2. The petitioner is admittedly the owner of the premises which is occupied by the respondent as a tenant and in respect of which eviction has been sought for by him. The petitioner who is the owner of the premises in question filed an application for eviction of the respondent who is a tenant, under S.10 (3) (a) (iii) of the Tamil Nadu Act 18 of 1960, as amended by Act 23 of 1973, on the ground that he requires the premises bona fide for his own use. The premises in question is a non-residential one and the case of the petitioner-landlord is that he requires the premises bona fide for carrying on his business which is being carried on in a premises not of his own in Kumbakonam town.

3. The said application for eviction was resisted by the respondent-tenant on various grounds of which the main ground is that the requirement of the landlord for his own use is not bona fide. To show that the application for eviction on the ground of o









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top