RAMANUJAM
A. Gopalkrishna Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
T. K. A. Yakub Hussain – Respondent
ORDER :- This revision is directed against the order of the Sub Court, Kumbakonam in C. M. A. No. 5 of 1982, setting aside the order of eviction passed by the Rent Controller against the respondent herein at the instance of the petitioner herein.
2. The petitioner is admittedly the owner of the premises which is occupied by the respondent as a tenant and in respect of which eviction has been sought for by him. The petitioner who is the owner of the premises in question filed an application for eviction of the respondent who is a tenant, under S.10 (3) (a) (iii) of the Tamil Nadu Act 18 of 1960, as amended by Act 23 of 1973, on the ground that he requires the premises bona fide for his own use. The premises in question is a non-residential one and the case of the petitioner-landlord is that he requires the premises bona fide for carrying on his business which is being carried on in a premises not of his own in Kumbakonam town.
3. The said application for eviction was resisted by the respondent-tenant on various grounds of which the main ground is that the requirement of the landlord for his own use is not bona fide. To show that the application for eviction on the ground of o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.