SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Mad) 454

NAINAR SUNDARAM
D. Rukmani Ammal – Appellant
Versus
V. K. Izudden – Respondent


Advocates:
V. Avudainayagam, for Petitioners; T. Viswanatha Rao, for Respondent.

Judgement

JUDGEMENT :- The landlords within the meaning of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (Act 18 of 1960) hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' are the petitioners in this revision. The respondent herein is the tenant within the meaning of the Act. The landlords sought the eviction of the tenant under Section 14 (1) (b) of the Act, on the ground that they bona fide required the premises demised for demolition and reconstruction. The tenant contested the petition of the landlords and yet, the Controller countenanced the case of the landlords and ordered eviction of the tenant. The tenant appealed and the Appellate Authority discountenanced the case of the landlords on two grounds, namely, (1) the premises demised consisted of two door numbers and single petition for eviction would not lie and (2) the landlords have not proved their means to undertake the work of demolition and reconstruction. The other points have been found in favour of the landlords by the appellate authority; the appellate authority found that the landlords are armed with a sanctioned plan from the corporation of Madras for the work of demolition and reconstruction and the existing condition

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top