Madras High Court
RAMAPRASADA RAO, NATARAJAN,BALASUBRAHMANYAN
Chief Controlling Revenue Authority Board of Revenue, Madras - Appellant
Versus
P.A.Muthukumar - Respondent
Decided On : 12/05/1977
STAMP DUTY - SETTLEMENT DEED - TRUST DEED - DISTINCTION - INSTRUMENT EXECUTED BY RESPONDENT IN FAVOUR OF HIS FATHER - WHETHER A SETTLEMENT DEED OR A TRUST DEED - HELD, A TRUST DEED.
Fact of the Case:
The respondent executed a deed in favor of his father, styling it as a private trust deed and appointing him as the trustee to carry out certain directions of his specifically enumerated therein. The Sub Registrar of Kavandapadi, Erode felt a doubt whether it would be a bare declaration of trust or a deed of settlement within the meaning of Sec. 2(24)(b) of the Indian Stamp Act, chargeable under Art.55 of Schedule 1-B (sic) (1 ?) of the Act.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the instrument in question was a trust deed and not a settlement deed. The court observed that the emphasis should be on the intention of the author of the trust to distribute the property among members of his family or to those who are near and clear to him. In the absence of a demonstrative exhibition of that intention to distribute his property among such members or relatives of his, it cannot be said mechanically by the use of the expressions such as 'his heirs' or 'his minor son' etc. in a document that such is the intention of the author.
Issues: Whether the document dated 2-7-1973 executed by the respondent in favor of his father P.N. Appaji Gounder herein styled as a document of trust should be treated as a settlement deed as defined under Sec. 2 (24) of the Act attracting stamp duty under Art.58 of Schedule I of the Indian Stamp Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the definition of 'settlement' in Sec. 2(24)(b) of the Indian Stamp Act and the definition of 'trust' in Sec. 3 of the Indian Trusts Act 1882. The court held that the instrument in question did not purport to distribute property of the settlor among the members of his family nor did he evince an unequivocal desire to provide property for some person dependent on him. The court further held that the instrument did not contain any dispositive clause and that there was no disposition or distribution in praesenti of the property under the instrument.
Final Decision: The court answered the question referred to it against the Revenue, holding that the instrument in question was a trust deed and not a settlement deed.
RAMAPRASADA RAO, J. :- The question involved in this reference made by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Board of Revenue, Madras is as follows :-
"Whether in the circumstances and facts of the case, the document dated 2-7-1973 (Document No. 26 of 1973) of Sub Registrar Office, Kavandapadi, Erode executed by the respondent in favour of his father P.N. Appaji Gounder herein styled as a document of trust should be treated as a settlement deed as defined under Sec. 2 (24) of the Act attracting stamp duty under Art.58 of Schedule I of the Indian Stamp Act."
or in the alternative, we add, whether the deed under reference is chargeable under Art.64, Schedule I of the Indian Stamp Act.
2. It is common ground that the deed has been duly stamped under Art.64 of Schedule 1-B (sic.) (1 ?) of the Stamp Act. Before considering the question posed to us, it is necessary to understand the recitals in the deed. It is common ground that the respondent and his two brothers and their father partitioned the family properties pursuant to a compromise decree passed in O.S. No. 230 of 1970 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Erode. It is the case of the respondent that subsequent to the said partition consequent upon an oral partition between himself and his minor son, they were enjoying their respective shares separately. In this perspective, the respondent caused to execute the deed in question on 2-7-1973, styling it as a private trust deed and appointed his father, P.N. Appaji Gounder as the trustee to carry out certain directions of his specifically enumerated therein. We find (a) that the trustee so nominated under the Will is to pay off certain debts of the
author of the trust and administer the property so as to preserve it, without wasting it, (b) that the trustee could improve the property and preserve the same till the lifetime of the respondent for the estate then available to be taken over by his heirs and that (c) the trustee should pay a monthly allowance of Rs. 200/- to the respondent during his lifetime.
3. Apart from the above specific objections of the trust, we do not find any disclosure of the intention of the purpose for which the deed in question was executed by the respondent. We however find inbuilt in the deed itself two reasons as to why the author of the trust executed this deed. Firstly he would say that any attempt at retaining the property himself might lead to dissipation of the same during his lifetime and secondly he had not the requisite experience or inclination to carry on agricultural operations so as to improve or even preserve the property.
4. It is in the above background the instrument in question came to light. When the Sub Registrar of Kavandapadi, Erode was asked to register this document he felt a doubt whether it would be a bare declaration of trust as it is styled or whether it would by reason of some recitals therein be interpreted and accepted only as a deed of settlement within the meaning of Sec. 2(24)(b) of the Indian Stamp Act, chargeable under Art.55 of Schedule 1-B (sic) (1 ?) of the Act.
5. The word 'settlement' has been defined in the Indian Stamp Act, but not the word 'Trust'. Sec. 2(24)(b) defines the ward 'settlement' as follows :-
"Settlement' means any non-testamentary disposition in writing of moveable or immoveable property, made for the purpose of distributing property of the settlor among his family or those for whom he desires to provide or for the purpose of providing for sons person dependent on him".
6. We are omitting clauses (a) and (c) of Sub-Sec. (24) of S.2 of the Act, for, they are not relevant for the purpose. According to Sec. 3 of the Indian Trusts Act 1882, a 'trust' is an obligation annexed to the ownership of property, and arising out of a confidence reposed in and accepted by the owner, or declared and accepted by the owner, or declared and accepted by him for the benefit of another, or of another and the owner. The instrument in question does no
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.